Monday, February 06, 2006

An Interview With serna

The editors of this blog would like to present another in our ongoing series of interviews with the creative “man behind the blog”, sernaferna.

Question: serna, thanks for coming back. Now, to begin, I’d like to ask—
Answer: No.

Q: Um... no? No what?
A: No, I’m not doing another interview.

Q: Why not?
A: Because the last time that we did this, I spent the whole time calling myself a nerd. And this time, I’ve just finished spending an hour or so fixing HTML-Kit with another macro, to make editing these posts easier. Which means I’m probably going to start calling myself a nerd again.

Q: Hmm. You might have a point there.
A: Indeed.

So, I guess that’s it for today’s interview. Thanks for coming!
posted at

13 comments:

  1. Anonymous8:09 p.m., February 06, 2006

    Gauntlet45

    *clears throat*
    nerd.......

    Was I one of the ones you missed?

    hehehehe

    ReplyDelete
  2. David Hunter8:53 p.m., February 06, 2006

    Yes. Yes you were.

    Jerk. ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous12:29 p.m., February 07, 2006

    Question: Is 'time' a trick of consciousness ?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous2:38 p.m., February 07, 2006

    Is "consciousness" a trick of time?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous4:42 p.m., February 07, 2006

    is the sea conscious of the fish?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous10:42 p.m., February 07, 2006

    And if it is.... what happens to the dolphins when they leave?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous11:56 p.m., February 09, 2006

    they will cease to be they, having moved from 4 dimensions to an infinitude. (sorry)

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous3:00 p.m., February 10, 2006

    I'm quite sure there's 10 dimensions, not 4.

    ReplyDelete
  9. David Hunter3:30 p.m., February 10, 2006

    According to String Theory, there are actually 26 dimensions...

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous8:58 a.m., February 11, 2006

    10 of the 26 dimensions are ordinary space-time dimensions, superstring theory "allows" for the 16 would be "internal" dimensions. I am care to only discuss facts here in your forum. So I will not discuss superstring theory, the Easter bunny or organized religion.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous11:09 a.m., February 11, 2006

    OK,OK, I meant perceptible dimensions. Don't tell me you're covered in string

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous5:44 p.m., February 11, 2006

    Not last I checked, but I could be and not realize it due to a trick of consciousness.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous1:50 p.m., February 13, 2006

    too many dimensions can leave you tongue tied

    ReplyDelete