tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11523536.post116593929002272510..comments2023-10-28T06:20:02.504-04:00Comments on sernaferna: Movie Review: Peter Jackson’s King KongDavid Hunterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08992882297558499646noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11523536.post-1165967599381930562006-12-12T18:53:00.000-05:002006-12-12T18:53:00.000-05:00A) I don't doubt that lots of people disagree with...A) I don't doubt that lots of people disagree with my views on <EM>King Kong</EM>—it was too popular for me to assume people will suddenly change their minds. I can see why people would think that Black was bad for the role, if I actually cared about the original <EM>King Kong</EM> in the first place.<BR/><BR/>B) At first, it surprised me that anyone could possibly view Naomi Watts' acting in <EM>Kong</EM> as good. (Well… maybe a pot smoker would think it rang true.) But then I clicked the link, and realized that the person posting runs a Naomi Watts fan blog, so I guess it's not surprising at all.David Hunterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08992882297558499646noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11523536.post-1165963740151182462006-12-12T17:49:00.000-05:002006-12-12T17:49:00.000-05:00you're the minority. more than 200 reviews i've re...you're the minority. more than 200 reviews i've read around the world agreed naomi watts gave the best performance in a most difficult role and was the best thing of the film. she was picked by the london film critics as the best actress of the year. on the other hand, many said jack black was a terrible miscast and had ruined the role of carl denham.Richard Steandric Ricsteandhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09006072094507321233noreply@blogger.com